Ability to stake the same fund tokens in the same wallet
For people like me who DCA every week/month into invictus funds, I hope you can allow the possibility to stake the same fund tokens more than once, in the same wallet.
Use Ledger for ICAP too
Only Metamask currently which seems not to be working al least for everyone. Would make sense to mirror what's done for the funds i.e. possible to sign transaction from H/W Ledger
Stop using Metamask for staking
Risky extension (simple due diligence outlines it); just mirror what's done for funds acquisition with the H/W wallet option. Same process so that people don't get super confused and puzzled with the need of changing browser. Your target is to become as user-friendly as Revolut, hopefully with the help of a super mobile app running both on Android and iOS
Reinvest: Purchase other Invictus tokens with ICAP
Given that ICAP functions similarly to a dividend, it would be good to be able to reinvest that dividend. The simplest mechanic to do so could be by being able to purchase new tokens in any of the open funds with your ICAP balance (claimed and unclaimed)
Launch "InvictusSwap" DEX governed by ICAP holders
What is your opinion on launching a "InvictusSwap" DEX based on Uniswap which is governed by ICAP holders? It would be Invictus-Token exclusive (ETH/USDC/BTC pairs) The ICAP treasury could be used to provide constant liquidity on all pairs. By doing that, fees can be collected which can be used to grow the liquidity pool further and/or to burn ICAP tokens to redistribute value to holders.
Consider/research LPs to maximise rewards and minimise IL
I think we should consider which DEX we will use for pooling our liquidity before just blindly choosing Uniswap. Balancer, for example, allows a more diversified pool (more than just 2 tokens and any weightings) and I think would help mitigate impermanent loss. Also ihf is already whitelisted there and so providing liquid earns BAL automatically. I request that someone who knows about this stuff works out the most optimal way for us to provide liquidity while reducing IL.
Limit maximum voting power
As some users staked big amounts they will have disproportional voting power for future decisions. For proper democratization of voting power, I suggest to cap the maximum voting power at some number that has to be determined. Please make suitable suggestions. The ICAP income will not be affected.
Stake ICAP to get more ICAP
Create a staking option for ICAP. The pool should have a 0-day withdrawal lock perpetual stake option, to which ICAP rewards from other stakes are automatically delivered. Auto-compounding, and saving of gas fees. This will attract investors and drive ICAP price up.
ICAP allocation in proportion to fees generated by fund
For ex, IHF generates high fees for IC, but rewards don't reflect that for staking IHF. Adding here for tracking/discussion, it was brought up in discord.
Choice to exclude early withdrawal
It would be great if we could chose to exclude early withdrawal. In the light of the Ledger breach, this could really lock the tokens and make them more secure during physical attacks. Only as an option, because early withdrawal might on the other hand be great for other people who look for more flexibility.